我需要 .9-12月杨帅口语素材，雅思百度网盘的链接有吗？急！

留学建涯小编给大家带来了我需要 .9-12月杨帅口语素材，雅思百度网盘的链接有吗？急！相关文章，一起来看一下吧。

本文目录一览：

• 1、我需要 2021.9-12月杨帅口语素材，雅思百度网盘的链接有吗？急！
• 2、雅思口语 求高手给素材
• 3、雅思口语教材推荐?

我需要 2021.9-12月杨帅口语素材，雅思百度网盘的链接有吗？急！

我这有这个资源，网盘地址：

?pwd=1234 提取码：1234

1、中学英语水平的学生的雅思学习方法。这类学生的词汇量与雅思考试要求相比有较大的差距，因此需要一年甚至更长的时间来学习和备考雅思，才能有可能通过考试，这么长的时间用来干什么?这个问题除了词汇和语法等最基本东西外，从最根本的听说读写各项着手是很有有效的，因为考生年纪小，可塑性强。要想进入国外大学至少雅思要考到5.5分，要上好一点的大学最好是雅思成绩达到6.5分。根据以往经验建议家长在给孩子定目标的时候最起码要定到6.5分甚至7分，因为定到6.5分可能孩子考出来的成绩只有5.5分，而定到5.5的话可能孩子只能考到4.5分。

2、达到英语四级水平的学生的雅思学习方法。这类学生具备了一定的英语基础，听说读写各方面都具备了一定的能力，大概半年时间基本上就可以完成雅思的学习和备考。

3、英语六级水平的学生的雅思学习方法。这些学生基本都已经具备了良好的英语能力，听说读写方面的基础都比较扎实，只需要三个月参加一些短期培训就可以完成雅思学习和备考。希望同学们能够多买一些雅思参考书进行备考。提前了解雅思考试报名时间也很重要。

对于以上三种学生建议最好是都参加一些雅思课程的培训，因为雅思的题型是经常在变化中的，很多都是你从来没有见过的，并且大多是主观题，在答题和应试上都有一定的规律可循，而这些规律如果学生自己去寻找的话那且不说不可能但确实很费功夫，但是我们的老师就不一样了，他们都长期专注在某一方面的内容，如阅读方面。所谓“术业有专攻”基本已经对这些都有了深刻的研究，因此能帮助你迅速有效地找到好的解决方案。一般的中学生在基础比较差的情况下最好是先报一个基础班，等具备一定的基础后可以再套报一个冲刺班，但是如果已经达到六级水平的话基本上就可以直接报个7分的冲刺班，没有必要再从基础班开始去折腾一遍了。

4、学生整体基础差或者发展严重不均匀的雅思学习方法。为什么有的孩子参加了很多次培训培训还是考不过，像这些基础很差或者发展严重不均匀的孩子，不论是把他放到几个人的小班和200多号人的大班都是不适合的，对他而言毫无意义。我们要根据学生的具体情况对症下药，像这类的学生建议其参加1对1 培训辅导，或者至少先通过一段时间的1对1后把基础打好了，在将其放到大班里面去。因为在大班上课基本上都没有机会跟老师交流，在学习中遇到的问题也不能很好的得到解决。而在1对1的学习中老师首先会对孩子的英语水平做一个全面的测试，摸清孩子的优势和弱项，兴趣和英语学习习惯，然后因材施教，查漏补缺，全面提升孩子的英语能力。

5、直通车方式的雅思学习方法。在父母亲都很忙，而孩子的基础又不好的情况下，那么建议你最好能选择一个值得信赖的机构从基础开始，从头到尾一步一步，采取一种直达的方式。因为这样的话即使父母没有太多的时间去关心孩子的学习，那么孩子们也会在培训机构严谨和科学的统一安排和系统培养下学到相应的英语知识，最后在直通车的英语培训与留学全程服务下顺利通向海外名校。

雅思口语 求高手给素材

JUDGE'S PLEDGE

THE JUDGE'S PLEDGE
As a member of the judiciary who desires to improve relations among
counsel and between the Bench and the Bar, I pledge as follows:
To be courteous, respectful and civil to the attorneys, parties, and
witnesses who appear before the court;
To exercise my authority to ensure that all the attorneys, parties, and
witnesses conduct themselves in a civil manner;
To refrain from any conduct or statement which discriminates on the basis
of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or other personal
characteristic of attorneys, parties, or witnesses;
To instruct all court personnel to act civilly toward attorneys, parties,
and witnesses;
To refrain from the use of abusive, demeaning or humiliating language and
opinions in oral or written communication with attorneys, parties, and
witnesses;
To be punctual in covering all hearings, meetings, and conferences;
To give full consideration to the papers and arguments presented by
counsel
To make a reasonable effort to decide promptly all matters presented for
decision;
To be aware of the time restraints and pressures imposed upon attorneys by
the exigencies of litigation practice, while nevertheless endeavoring to
resolve disputes efficiently;
To make every effort to adhere to the statutes and court rules which are
intended to establish uniformity among all of the courts;
To consider the legitimate calendaring conflicts of attorneys, parties,
and witnesses in the administration of those matters before the court;
To avoid conduct which would give an appearance of favoritism to any
particular counsel or party;
To be mindful that the court is the servant of the people and its purpose
is the administration of justice.

法官的保证
作为法官队伍中的一名希望改善律师之间的关系以及法官与律师之间的关系的成员，本文作出如下保证：
对出庭或到庭的律师、当事人以及证人礼貌、尊重、文明；
行使本人的职权以保证所有的律师、当事人以及证人以文明方式行事；
避免任何歧视律师、当事人或者证人的种族、宗教、性别、性取向、或其他个人特征的行为或语言；
指示所有法院人员以文明方式对待律师、当事人以及证人；
在与律师、当事人以及证人的口头或书面交流中避免辱骂性的、贬损性的或羞辱性的语言或意见；
准时进行所有的聆审和会议；
充分考虑律师呈交的所有文件和做出的所有辩论；
做出合理努力以迅速地对所有待决事项做出决定；
考虑到诉讼实践给律师带来的时间限制和压力，但是仍然努力有效地解决争端；
尽力遵守旨在使所有法院统一的制定法和法院规则；
在处理法院事务是考虑律师、当事人以及证人的合理的时间冲突；
避免任何对某个律师或当事人由偏袒迹象的行为；
谨记法院是人民的公仆，其目的是维护正义。

Judges

Fewer than one in twenty of those admitted to practice law is a federal, state, county, or municipal court judge. Except for some inferior courts, judges are generally required to be admitted to practice but do not practice while on the bench. There is so little uniformity that it is difficult to generalize further than to point out three salient characteristics that relate to the ranks from which judges are drawn, to the method of their selection, and to their tenure.

Judges are drawn from the practicing bar and less frequently from government service or the teaching profession. There is in the United States no career judiciary like that found in many other countries and there is no prescribed route for the young law graduate who aspires to be a judge, no apprenticeship that must be served, no service that must be entered. The outstanding young law graduates who act for a year or two as law clerks to the most distinguished judges of the federal and state courts have only the reward of the experience to take with them into practice and not the promise of a judicial career. While it is not uncommon for a vacancy on a higher court to be filled by a judge from a lower court, even this cannot be said to be the rule. The legal profession is not entirely unaware of the advantages of a career judiciary, but it is generally thought that they are outweighed by the experience and independence which American lawyers bring to the bench. Many of the outstanding judges of the country�s highest courts have had no prior judicial experience. Criticism has centered instead on the prevalent method of selection of judges.

State court judges are usually elected, commonly by popular vote, but occassionally by the legislature. Popular election has been the subject of much disapproval, including that of the American Bar Association, on the ground that the public lacks interest in and information on candidates for judicial office and that therefore the outcome is too often controlled by leaders of political parties. The situation has been somewhat improved since many local bar associations have undertaken to evaluate the qualifications of candidates and to support or oppose them on this basis.

Since 1937, the American Bar Association has advocated the substitution of a system under which the governor appoints judges from a list submitted by a special nominating board and the judge then periodically stands unopposed for reelection by popular vote on the basis of his or her record. Such a system is now in effect, for at least some judges, in a substantial minority of states. In a small group of states, judges are appointed by the governor subject to legislative confirmation.

This is also the method of selection of federal judges, who are appointed by the President subject to confirmation by the Senate. Even under the appointive system the selection of judges is not immune from political influence and appointees are usually of the President�s or governor�s own party. But names of candidates for the federal judiciary are submitted to a committee of the American Bar Association and appointment is usually made only with its approval. The office of chief judge or chief justice is usually filled in the same manner as other judicial offices, although in some states it is filled from among the members of the court by rotation, by seniority of service, or by vote of the judges. The Chief Justice of the United States is appointed by the President, subject to Senate confirmation.

The third characteristic is that judges commonly serve for a term of years rather than for life. For courts of general jurisdiction it is typically four, six, or eight years, and for appellate courts, six, eight, or ten years. Happily, even where selection is by popular election, it is customary to return to office for sitting judges whose service has been satisfactory. In a few state courts and in the federal courts the judges sit for life. Whether on the bench for a term of years or for life, a judge may be removed from office only for gross misconduct and only by formal proceedings. Instances of removal have been rare indeed and only a handful of federal judges have been removed by formal proceedings. The independence of the judiciary is also encouraged by the rule that a judge incurs no civil liability for judicial acts, even if guilty of fraud and corruption. The American Bar Association�s Code of Judicial Conduct has been widely adopted as a standard to which judges are expected to adhere. Salaries for the higher judicial offices are usually good although less than the income of a successful private practitioner, the prestige of these offices is high, and the bench has been able to attract many of the country�s ablest legal minds. The great names in American law are in large part the names of its great judges.

TEAMWORK

留学建涯

雅思口语教材推荐?

参考资料：因人而异，可能大家需要的参考书籍会有所不同。根据大家英语基础的不同，我分了以下几种情况。
1.每次雅思考试后童鞋们回忆的真题，对于基础非常好的童鞋，只要练好这些题目就够了，毕竟底子在。
2.对于基础还ok，语言功底还不错，但是口语技巧方面有所欠缺的同学，我推荐大家使用慎小嶷的《十天突破雅思口语》，里面技巧性的东西大家不妨学学，但是大家要注意，因为这本书使用率非常高，里面模版性的内容就不建议大家使用了。比较好大家能仿照模板，创造出自己专属的口语模板。
3.另一本我想推荐给大家的是《雅思口语救星》，这个可以使用的人群比较广，口语没思路或者语言组织不地道的考生都可以使用，甚至基础非常好但是可能由于紧张等特殊原因拿不到高分的同学也可以使用。
注：我整理的口语题库特别是雅思口语900句可以免费提供给大家使用，对于有需要的同学，我建议还是在当当还有其他正规渠道买一本《十天》。预测和回忆是雅思考试的两大重心，大家可以将练习重点放在这两个地方。
，希望能对广大在‘杀鸭’路上的烤鸭们有所帮助！想要知道更多雅思资讯请关注环球青藤雅思频道。祝大家考试顺利！
环球青藤友情提示:以上就是[ 雅思口语教材推荐? ]问题解答,希望能够帮助到大家！

以上就是留学建涯小编给大家带来的我需要 .9-12月杨帅口语素材，雅思百度网盘的链接有吗？急！，希望能对大家有所帮助。